Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Fantasy » alt.fan.pratchett » [I] RPG.net
[I] RPG.net [message #263778] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 21:28
Stacie Hanes  
Okay, there was a conversation I . . .witnessed. Yes, witnessed is the right
word, and entirely accurate.

Genesis: Bad Kitty sees the tagline "Lolth: Nanny Ogg in Training"

Bad Kitty:

Originally Posted by Bad Kitty
I wondered when I might meet you. I'm Granny Weatherwax in training.


Originally Posted by Lolth
Well how do you do?

Fancy a nip of scumble? Purely herbal, I swear...


Originally Posted by Bad Kitty
I can't be having with that.


Originally Posted by Lolth
Now, all we need is someone writing slash about Granny Weatherwax, Nanny
Ogg, Magrat Garlick and Agnes Nitt, and then we'd have full Tangency
experience.

Bonus points for wingfic.

Woot!

Bottoms up!


Bad Kitty:

ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!!!!!

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students,
AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion & AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED
"If you can't be a good example, you'll just have to be a horrible
warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263830 ] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 22:52
Lister  
On Mon, 08 May 2006 19:28:07 GMT, "Stacie Hanes"
<house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

<snip>

>
>Bonus points for wingfic.
>
>Woot!
>
>Bottoms up!
>
>
>Bad Kitty:
>
>ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!!!!!


Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263833 ] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 22:56
exquisite witch peach  
Lister wrote:

> On Mon, 08 May 2006 19:28:07 GMT, "Stacie Hanes"
> <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>Bonus points for wingfic.
>>
>>Woot!
>>
>>Bottoms up!
>>
>>
>>Bad Kitty:
>>
>>ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!!!!!
>
>
>
> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)


I'm horrified.
Re: RPG.net [message #263872 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 02:56
rja.carnegie  
I can't remember how the raucous pop music quiz recently got onto the
question of "cockney lesbians" - maybe they had one there - but I
wasn't sure whether to be glad, sorry, or to write in then they didn't
go anywhere near "Knees Up, Mother Brown".

Possibly no one wanted to know that.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263942 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 09:24
Orjan Westin  
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Lister wrote:
>>
>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>
> I'm horrified.

Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting dynamic,
especially if Perdita took over halfway through.

Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263968 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 13:46
Stacie Hanes  
Orjan Westin wrote:
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> Lister wrote:
>>>
>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>>
>> I'm horrified.
>
> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>

I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of the whip.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263971 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 13:57
Orjan Westin  
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Orjan Westin wrote:
>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>> Lister wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>>>
>>> I'm horrified.
>>
>> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>
> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of the
> whip.

Can't you always?

Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263983 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 16:37
Stacie Hanes  
Orjan Westin wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>> Lister wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm horrified.
>>>
>>> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>>> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>>
>> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
>> the whip.
>
> Can't you always?

You know *far* too much.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263988 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 17:10
exquisite witch peach  
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Orjan Westin wrote:
>
>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>
>>>Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>
>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Lister wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm horrified.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>>>>dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>>>
>>>I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
>>>the whip.
>>
>>Can't you always?
>
>
> You know *far* too much.
>

He clearly does! I wasn't talking, I swear!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263993 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 17:22
Orjan Westin  
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
>>>> the whip.
>>>
>>> Can't you always?
>>
>> You know *far* too much.
>
> He clearly does! I wasn't talking, I swear!

Richard told me.

Either that or I'm just clever - pick what's more concievable.

Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #263995 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 17:29
exquisite witch peach  
Orjan Westin wrote:

> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>
>>>Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
>>>>>the whip.
>>>>
>>>>Can't you always?
>>>
>>>You know *far* too much.
>>
>> He clearly does! I wasn't talking, I swear!
>
>
> Richard told me.
>
> Either that or I'm just clever - pick what's more concievable.
>
> Orjan

I think you are very clever already.

And I didn't tell Richard either!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264011 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 20:04
Brian Wakeling  
In a speech called LO18g.505$Jf.188 [at] newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net,
Stacie Hanes uttered thus:
> Orjan Westin wrote:
> > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > > Orjan Westin wrote:
> > > > peachy ashie passion wrote:
> > > > > Lister wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm horrified.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
> > > > dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
> > >
> > > I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack
> > > of the whip.
> >
> > Can't you always?
>
> You know *far* too much.

That is why he must die!

Mwahahahaha!


--
http://freespace.virgin.net/b.wakeling/index.html
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sabremeister/
Use b dot wakeling at virgin dot net to reply
There is nothing wrong with my...
um..
er...
Memory!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264016 ] Di, 09 Mai 2006 20:13
Andrew Nevill  
On Tue, 9 May 2006 08:24:43 +0100, "Orjan Westin" <nospam [at] cunobaros.com>
wrote:


>
>Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting dynamic,
>especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>

Thankyousoverymuch for *that* image.

I really ought to fetch myself the brain bleach. But..... the thought is
just so.... fascinating.


--
Andrew Nevill B.F. D.W. FdV. Reply address: anevill [at] btopenworld.com
AFPWorshipper to Spooky, AFPfiance to Sarah (Nanny Ogg) & S*****
AFPUncle to James Vaughan. You cannot value friends as pennies,
nor can you replace them as easily (Spooky in email, Aug 2001.)
Discworld Convention 2006. 18 - 26 Aug 2006 Hinckley Island Hotel
Hinckley, UK www.dwcon.org
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264066 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 00:05
Stacie Hanes  
Brian Wakeling wrote:
> In a speech called
> LO18g.505$Jf.188 [at] newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, Stacie Hanes
> uttered thus:
>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>>> Lister wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm horrified.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>>>>> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>>>>
>>>> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack
>>>> of the whip.
>>>
>>> Can't you always?
>>
>> You know *far* too much.
>
> That is why he must die!
>
> Mwahahahaha!

There are a couple of people on *that* list. Several of them here.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264076 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 00:20
FiX01  
On Tue, 09 May 2006 22:05:26 GMT, "Stacie Hanes"
<house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

>Brian Wakeling wrote:
>> In a speech called
>> LO18g.505$Jf.188 [at] newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, Stacie Hanes
>> uttered thus:
>>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>>>> Lister wrote:

>>>>>>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)

>>>>>>> I'm horrified.

>>>>>> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>>>>>> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.

>>>>> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack
>>>>> of the whip.

>>>> Can't you always?

>>> You know *far* too much.

>> That is why he must die!

>> Mwahahahaha!

>There are a couple of people on *that* list. Several of them here.

Such as the whole froup, for instance?

FiX
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264081 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 00:26
Stacie Hanes  
FiX wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 22:05:26 GMT, "Stacie Hanes"
> <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Brian Wakeling wrote:
>>> In a speech called
>>> LO18g.505$Jf.188 [at] newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, Stacie Hanes
>>> uttered thus:
>>>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>>> Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>>>>> Lister wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Lesbian slash involving the witches. I like it :)
>
>>>>>>>> I'm horrified.
>
>>>>>>> Oh, I don't know. Agnes and Diamanta could be an interesting
>>>>>>> dynamic, especially if Perdita took over halfway through.
>
>>>>>> I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack
>>>>>> of the whip.
>
>>>>> Can't you always?
>
>>>> You know *far* too much.
>
>>> That is why he must die!
>
>>> Mwahahahaha!
>
>> There are a couple of people on *that* list. Several of them here.
>
> Such as the whole froup, for instance?
>

That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.

Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264082 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 00:33
Philippa Cowderoy  
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Stacie Hanes wrote:

> That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
>
> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>

Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?

--
flippa [at] flippac.org

Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations.
Ivanova is God.
And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264083 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 00:37
Stacie Hanes  
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2006, Stacie Hanes wrote:
>
>> That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
>>
>> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>>
>
> Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?

<splutter>

I knew I was forgettting someone.

Well, of course you can be the bottom.

I doubt anyone will ever dislodge peach from her position as possessor of
the largest body of embarrassing information.

How nice . . . I have my own group of "first against the wall come the
revolution."

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264129 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 05:10
exquisite witch peach  
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 9 May 2006, Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
>>>
>>>Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>>>
>>
>>Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?
>
>
> <splutter>
>
> I knew I was forgettting someone.
>
> Well, of course you can be the bottom.
>
> I doubt anyone will ever dislodge peach from her position as possessor of
> the largest body of embarrassing information.
>
> How nice . . . I have my own group of "first against the wall come the
> revolution."
>


hey now!!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264132 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 05:46
Flesh-eating Dragon  
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> FiX wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>> Brian Wakeling wrote:
>>>> Stacie Hanes uttered thus:

>>>>> You know *far* too much.
>>>>
>>>> That is why he must die!
>>>> Mwahahahaha!
>>
>>> There are a couple of people on *that* list. Several of them here.
>>
>> Such as the whole froup, for instance?
>
> That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.

No need to kill me - you have two excellent means of protection.

1. MAD.

2. Bribery.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264143 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 08:18
geminii  
On Tue, 09 May 2006 22:37:32 GMT, "Stacie Hanes"
<house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

>How nice . . . I have my own group of "first against the wall come the
>revolution."

Speaking of arresting mental images...


-SteveD
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264148 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 08:47
Flesh-eating Dragon  
geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>
>>How nice . . . I have my own group of "first against the wall come the
>>revolution."
>
> Speaking of arresting mental images...

If I'm allowed to nominate a wall for Stacie to us against, I choose
the wall from the "Spikes of Doom" scene in _Curse of Fatal Death_.

Adrian.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264159 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 13:33
sphira9343  
Stacie Hanes wrote:

[Stacie's 'first against the wall' list]

> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.

But we like those people!

Couldn't we just make them a cup of unpleasantly strong tea instead?
:-)

CCA
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264161 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 13:45
Stacie Hanes  
CCA wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>
> [Stacie's 'first against the wall' list]
>
>> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>
> But we like those people!
>
> Couldn't we just make them a cup of unpleasantly strong tea instead?
> :-)


Sure. I never specified what we'd do once we had 'em up against the wall.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264168 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 14:01
geminii  
On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:17:23 +0930, "8'FED" <dragon [at] netyp.com.au> wrote:

>If I'm allowed to nominate a wall for Stacie to us against, I choose
>the wall from the "Spikes of Doom" scene in _Curse of Fatal Death_.

Must...not...ask...about...missing...verb!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264171 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 14:05
aqusenet  
Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

> Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >
> >> That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
> >>
> >> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
> >>
> >
> > Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?
>
> <splutter>
>
> I knew I was forgettting someone.
>
> Well, of course you can be the bottom.
>
> I doubt anyone will ever dislodge peach from her position as possessor of
> the largest body of embarrassing information.
>
> How nice . . . I have my own group of "first against the wall come the
> revolution."

The thing is that come the revolution you're just on the other side of
the wheel.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264194 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 16:59
exquisite witch peach  
geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:17:23 +0930, "8'FED" <dragon [at] netyp.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>If I'm allowed to nominate a wall for Stacie to us against, I choose
>>the wall from the "Spikes of Doom" scene in _Curse of Fatal Death_.
>
>
> Must...not...ask...about...missing...verb!

This froup is rapidly becoming full of more things we aren't asking
about than things we are!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264204 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 17:40
Flesh-eating Dragon  
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
>> 8'FED wrote:

>>>If I'm allowed to nominate a wall for Stacie to us against, I choose
>>>the wall from the "Spikes of Doom" scene in _Curse of Fatal Death_.
>>
>> Must...not...ask...about...missing...verb!
>
> This froup is rapidly becoming full of more things we aren't asking about
> than things we are!

Peachy, I wish to urgently advise you that Stacie probably would not
want you to click on the following link, on the grounds that it would
only give you ideas. I trust that you understand this advice perfectly.

http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/Curse/curse1.html

(I've emailed the site maintainer to point out the spelling error at
the bottom - if "faeces" is spelt correctly by the time you read it,
then he's received my email and corrected it.)

Adrian.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264211 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 18:19
exquisite witch peach  
8'FED wrote:

> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>8'FED wrote:
>
>
>>>>If I'm allowed to nominate a wall for Stacie to us against, I choose
>>>>the wall from the "Spikes of Doom" scene in _Curse of Fatal Death_.
>>>
>>>Must...not...ask...about...missing...verb!
>>
>> This froup is rapidly becoming full of more things we aren't asking about
>>than things we are!
>
>
> Peachy, I wish to urgently advise you that Stacie probably would not
> want you to click on the following link, on the grounds that it would
> only give you ideas. I trust that you understand this advice perfectly.
>
> http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/Curse/curse1.html
>
> (I've emailed the site maintainer to point out the spelling error at
> the bottom - if "faeces" is spelt correctly by the time you read it,
> then he's received my email and corrected it.)
>
> Adrian.
>
>

I shall carefully avoid reading it, as advised.

Besides, the plot made me dizzy.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264213 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 17:45
v$af$ppint  
- hi; in afparticle, <MQ88g.592$x4.413 [at] newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
house_damodred [at] yahoo.com "Stacie Hanes" got down to fundamentals:
> Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>
>>>That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
>>>Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>>
>>Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?
>
><splutter>
>
>I knew I was forgettting someone.
>
>Well, of course you can be the bottom.
>
>I doubt anyone will ever dislodge peach from her position [...]
>
- have you [1] by any chance read [2] _The Joy of Frogs_?

- love, ppint.
[the address from which this was posted bounces e-mail;
please change the "f" to a "g" and drop the "v" if you
wish to cc. or e-mail me.]

[1] - you in particular *and* you = afp in general

[2] - if that's *quite* la verbe juste...
--
"tongues are tentacles, too:
- tentacles with *_teeth_*"
- yr hmbl srppnt. 14 or 15/7/96 (7/14 or 15/96 for merkins)
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264229 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 20:08
Brian Howlett  
On 10 May, 8'FED wrote:

[snip]
>
> http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/Curse/curse1.html
>
> (I've emailed the site maintainer to point out the spelling error at
> the bottom - if "faeces" is spelt correctly by the time you read it,
> then he's received my email and corrected it.)
>
"Faeces" has been corrected, or at least is correct. Now, how about
"abhored", "mondulated", "anitcipated", "vetilation", "nausiating" and
"convinient"?
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
-----------------------------------------------------
This .sig deliberately left blank...
[I] RPG.net [message #264230 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 20:14
Lizzie  
Brian Howlett wrote:
> On 10 May, 8'FED wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/Curse/curse1.html
> >
> > (I've emailed the site maintainer to point out the spelling error at
> > the bottom - if "faeces" is spelt correctly by the time you read it,
> > then he's received my email and corrected it.)
> >
> "Faeces" has been corrected, or at least is correct. Now, how about
> "abhored", "mondulated", "anitcipated", "vetilation", "nausiating" and
> "convinient"?

And how about "feaces" in part two, which is still wrong?

//Stina
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264235 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 20:30
Brian Howlett  
On 10 May, Lizzie wrote:

[snip]
>
> And how about "feaces" in part two, which is still wrong?
>
I only read part one. We already know he's sh1t at spelling...

Ooh! A x-threading gem from the .sigmonster ;-)
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Mobile phones - the only topic of discussion where men boast about
how *small* theirs is...
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264290 ] Mi, 10 Mai 2006 23:32
raltbos  
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach [at] hotmail.com> wrote:

> Orjan Westin wrote:
>
> > peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >
> >>Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >>
> >>>Orjan Westin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
> >>>>>the whip.
> >>>>
> >>>>Can't you always?
> >>>
> >>>You know *far* too much.
> >>
> >> He clearly does! I wasn't talking, I swear!
> >
> > Richard told me.
> >
> > Either that or I'm just clever - pick what's more concievable.
>
> I think you are very clever already.

That much is obvious, yes.

> And I didn't tell Richard either!

Oh yes, you did! And the rest of us, too. And so did Stacie.

Richard
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264299 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 00:56
Flesh-eating Dragon  
Brian Howlett wrote:
> 8'FED wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/Curse/curse1.html
>>
>> (I've emailed the site maintainer to point out the spelling error at
>> the bottom - if "faeces" is spelt correctly by the time you read it,
>> then he's received my email and corrected it.)
>>
> "Faeces" has been corrected, or at least is correct. Now, how about
> "abhored", "mondulated", "anitcipated", "vetilation", "nausiating" and
> "convinient"?

"Anitcipated" is an ordinary spelling error. I can ignore that sort of
thing. Spelling "faeces" as "feicies" is in an entirely different
league. It suggests ignorance rather than mere bad spelling.

Adrian.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264310 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 02:28
Stacie Hanes  
"ppint. at IMT" wrote:
> - hi; in afparticle,
> <MQ88g.592$x4.413 [at] newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> house_damodred [at] yahoo.com "Stacie Hanes" got down to fundamentals:
>> Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's one POV, but some definitely more than others.
>>>> Orjan, Alec, Adrian, and peachy are at the top.
>>>
>>> Hrmm, does that mean I get the bottom place?
>>
>> <splutter>
>>
>> I knew I was forgettting someone.
>>
>> Well, of course you can be the bottom.
>>
>> I doubt anyone will ever dislodge peach from her position [...]
>>
> - have you [1] by any chance read [2] _The Joy of Frogs_?
<snip>
> [1] - you in particular *and* you = afp in general
>
> [2] - if that's *quite* la verbe juste...

No, but I do find frogs joyful.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264324 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 04:38
exquisite witch peach  
Richard Bos wrote:

> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Orjan Westin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Orjan Westin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm fascinated in spite of myself. I can almost hear the crack of
>>>>>>>the whip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Can't you always?
>>>>>
>>>>>You know *far* too much.
>>>>
>>>> He clearly does! I wasn't talking, I swear!
>>>
>>>Richard told me.
>>>
>>>Either that or I'm just clever - pick what's more concievable.
>>
>> I think you are very clever already.
>
>
> That much is obvious, yes.
>
>
>> And I didn't tell Richard either!
>
>
> Oh yes, you did! And the rest of us, too. And so did Stacie.
>
> Richard

See, Stacie did it!!!

Wasn't me, I'm innocent!
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264325 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 04:41
Stacie Hanes  
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Richard Bos wrote:
>
<snips whips>

>> Oh yes, you did! And the rest of us, too. And so did Stacie.
>>
>
> See, Stacie did it!!!

"so did Stacie"

> Wasn't me, I'm innocent!

Excuse me, but what sort of dictionary are you using? I think it's faulty.

--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264335 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 10:03
SeekUp  
"8'FED" <dragon [at] netyp.com.au> wrote

> "Anitcipated" is an ordinary spelling error. I can ignore that sort of
> thing. Spelling "faeces" as "feicies" is in an entirely different
> league. It suggests ignorance rather than mere bad spelling.
>
> Adrian.
>


The distinction is too subtle for me. Not that I regard poor spelling as
ignorance, except in the most literal sense of the word.
Re: [I] RPG.net [message #264357 ] Do, 11 Mai 2006 14:19
Arthur Hagen  
Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> No, but I do find frogs joyful.

With all the kisses they get, they would be.

Ribbit,
--
*Art
Vorheriges Thema:what would you see if a 4d visitor said hello ? :)
Nächstes Thema:Upcoming production of Lords and Ladies!
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 05:47:28 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,08738 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered